White House hopeful Mitt Romney and 400 of his closest friends raised more than $6.5 million in a single day at a chic fund raising blitz that served notice upon all Republican rivals.
Monday's event at the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center was styled more like an electronics expo than a political fund raiser. It featured a four-screen projection TV system suspended from the ceiling, displaying pictures that included Romney in the Oval Office and at the presidential lectern. (We'll see about that, Mitt.) The newly anti-gay, former governor of Massachusetts used the event to shore up support among evangelicals who have not been too pleased to learn that he ran as a moderate for the U.S. Senate in 1994, as well as for Massachusetts governor in 2002.
"Now, I wasn't always a Ronald Reagan conservative. Neither was Ronald Reagan, by the way. And perhaps some in this room have had the opportunity to listen, learn, and benefit from life's experience and to grow in wisdom, as I have. My life experience convinced me that Ronald Reagan was right. I'm a conservative that gets the job done. And you don't just have to take my word for it, you can just look at my record."
Actually, much more interesting than Romeny's overnight conservative credentials is the pact that he's attempting to make with evangelicals. To say the least, it's odd. Romney is a Mormon and most far-right Christians and evangelicals have regarded that religion as heretical and/or a cult.
The only thing that we find troubling about Mormons—and we bring this up only because Mitt Romney is marketing his faith and values toward far-right Christians—is the fact that the Church banned blacks from the priesthood until 1978 and considered their/our dark skin as a "curse." Mitt Romney was 31 years old in 1978, so, for the first 31 years of his life, he was actively involved in and became an elder of a church with a racist history.
Haven't heard him explain that one—yet—but we're going to keep asking.
Romney Kicks Off Presidential Campaign (USA Today)
Romney's Faith May Prevent Him From Going All the Way (Fox News)
Blacks and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Wiki)








Wow. Did not know this about the Mormon Church.
Posted by: carl | 09 January 2007 at 11:18
A religion with a checkered past?!? Romney has some explaining to do, since he's obviously the official spokesman for Mormon church!
A shame something like that could happen in our great nation, where we've never tolerated any form of racism.
Posted by: Andrew | 09 January 2007 at 11:28
Andrew, isn't that a bit sarcastic. Rod specifically said that he's only asking b/c Romney is making faith and religion a cornerstone of his campaign. If he is, why shouldn't he explain his own religion.
And yes the Mormon church has a huge racist past. Don't try to deny it.
Posted by: Greg G | 09 January 2007 at 12:46
Andrew, this is Rod.
I didn't say "checked" past. I said "racist history." Let me correct that: Recent racist history, because the 1960s and 1970s are relativelty recent.
BTW, I didn't know there were many Rod 2.0 readers in Provo, Utah.
Posted by: Rod McCullom | 09 January 2007 at 12:52
Well, I didn't say "checked" either, Rod. But would you disagree with "checkered" being an applicable term in that context?
And I'm not denying the church's racist past, as viewed through contemporary retrospect. I just don't think Romney's basing his political platform on his religion as much as we think. Does the mere fact that he is running automatically imply that he has to explain every obscure doctrine of his personal religion?
Either way, I didn't mean to be taken very seriously. My first post was my backwards way of saying I disagree. No real harm intended... honest.
Oh, and when I say "his religion," I mean "our religion." You probably guessed that by now, though.
*hides in Provo basement apartment*
Posted by: Andrew | 10 January 2007 at 10:20
Okay, Andrew, you "checked" the typo, lol, it should have read "checkered."
Perhaps that word is applicable in this context. Most Christian faiths certainly have a checkered past littered with racism, sexism and yes, homophobia. (BTW, in case you haven't guessed, I'm one of those progressive liberal Christian types.) However, one of the central tenets of the Mormon faith was its belief in the "Curse of Ham" and that only changed within the past generation. It's certainly not obscure.
This is important because the new Mitt Romney--not the old, progressive moderate Republican--has chosen to align himself with the evangelical wing of his party that seeks to fuse church and state. Since Mitt is endearing himself to evangelicals, it's only fair that we consider the evangelical message that Romney brought to the world when he was a young Mormon missionary. Ironically, it seems that he was posted to ... Africa.
BTW, Provo is a beautiful town, I've been there once or twice. No need to cower in your basement. ;)
Posted by: Rod McCullom | 10 January 2007 at 10:46
When I say "obscure," I mean it's not something commonly discussed in a normal church atmosphere. Things may have been different a few decades ago, but my point is that I don't think Romney is responsible for explaining his second-hand associations with outdated church doctrines, even if they are apparently racist from our point of view.
I imagine that if you were to ask him, his answer would probably be something like this: our doctrine relies heavily on divine revelation from God, since He is the only one that could bar blacks from holding the priesthood and then later allow them to receive it.
Considering you call yourself Christian, I hope you will agree that God has that authority. I think it's up to us to research the subject on our own rather than expect an explanation from Romney, especially because such an explanation may not ever be given.
Posted by: Andrew | 10 January 2007 at 11:46
Andrew, I'm sorry but I disagree. "God" didn't bar blacks from the Mormon church priesthood; Mormon elders barred them from temples to receive their sacraments and only changed their policy when their evangelism in Brazil would have made it almost impossible to ordain anyone who was not 100% white.
Throughout much of the 20th century, "God" didn't bar black men from the priesthood in most Protestant faiths and the Catholic Church.
Do not confuse Mormon doctrine with "God." Then again, doesn't the Mormon "church" believe that Jesus was a MORTAL man living in the 19th century?
Posted by: Greg G | 10 January 2007 at 11:57
Greg, doesn't every religious adherent believe their organization is divinely inspired? That why I was careful to not phrase my second paragraph exclusively (I specifically used the word "could" rather than simply say "He barred"). I don't think I'm confusing my church with God, but I do believe that His will guides my church.
As for the question posed in your closing paragraph, my answer is "no." If you're referring to Joseph Smith, then you have a very skewed perspective of what we believe and should do some real research before you can expect to corner us in a theological debate.
As a side note, does it seem like I'm interested in picking a fight? That's not my intent... honest!
Posted by: Andrew | 10 January 2007 at 12:42
Although we have freedom of religion in this country, no one has a "right" to be elected to office. If there is probable cause for concern that a candidate believes or has ever believed that certain citizens of the country bear the "curse of Ham," people have a right to question him about that and talk about his response. Wouldn't anyone want to know that?
Posted by: Mark | 10 January 2007 at 12:55
... (not to mention, whether he believes any people in the world at all bear that curse!) ...
In referring to an American president's responsibility to American citizens, I did not mean to neglect the importance of the rest of the world's people, either, of course.
Posted by: Mark | 10 January 2007 at 13:06
Andrew, the answer to your question is "yes."
You've never commented here before, and, these comment boards are often attacked by anti-gay, racist or pro-right wing types who came across Rod 2.0 while Googling their cause du jour. Also, the Provo ISP and revisionism of the Mormon Church's recent past certainly implies you're not black; it would also imply that you're not (openly) gay.
However, all are welcome here as long as they are respectful. But save your breath--I'm going to talk about this more today and later this week and more. I'll also post an email received from a Romney campaign operative.
Posted by: Rod McCullom | 10 January 2007 at 13:12