The Terry McMillan - Jonathan Plummer soap opera continues...
Now, the best-selling author is suing her ex-husband for a whopping $40 million, claiming that he tried to "humiliate and embarrass" her during their highly publicized 2005 divorce.
McMillan filed the complaint yesterday in Contra Costa County Superior Court. The action claims Plummer, who is native to Jamaica, married McMillan in 1998 with the sole purpose of obtaining U.S. citizenship. McMillan's allegations also include "emotional distress, invasion of privacy and placing her in a 'false light' to harm her professionally and personally." McMillan also claims Plummer violated a restraining order ... by calling her to speak with her son.
Plummer is 23 years McMillan's junior and their whirlwind, tropical romance inspired her best-selling 1996 novel, How Stella Got Her Groove Back, which was later adapted for the big-screen staring Angela Bassett and Taye Diggs. Plummer later came out of the closet, announced that he was gay, and, that began a roller-coaster tabloid divorce. The couple eventually settled for an undisclosed amount.
In November 2005, McMillan and Plummer appeared on Oprah as part of a heavily-promoted "reconciliation" that, more or less, reconciled nothing. At the time, some criticized Plummer for cheating on his wife during their marriage and accused him of being a fortune-hunter.

Others took issue with McMillan's language toward Jonathan—including calling him a "faggot"—and her alarmist charges regarding the "down-low" and HIV. In addition, it was disclosed at the end of the segment that Oprah Winfrey had purchased the film rights to McMillan's The Interruption of Everything, which debuted on the charts that week, leading some to speculate on a conflict of interest.
Regardless of whose side you take, Plummer's story—growing up in a homophobic culture, facing a hostile public when coming out, etc—illustrates why so many black gay men remain in the closet.
You'll recall, exactly one year ago we had several long conversations with Terry McMillan after her controversial cover profile at Clik, which followed Jonathan Plummer's own cover profile.. At the time, the author revealed that she was considering litigation because, in her words, Jonathan was attempting to "extort" money beyond their settlement. Terry also said she had been threatened, and, at the time, sounded genuinely concerned about her well-being and that of her son.
Jonathan Plummer is now a hair stylist in Northern California. Even if McMillan were to prevail in the litigation—and she certainly could drag out the process, given her resources—it's unlikely the millionaire author would ever collect a monetary judgment.
Author Terry McMillan sues ex-husband for $40 million [Contra Costa Times]
Some Background ...








Oh, Terry, please. Let. It. Go.
Write a book about it, make money there. Have some fun with it.
You were hardly humiliated. You just keep the story GOING by keeping it in the news... er... uh... unless that's your point?
Posted by: Andy in Seattle | 22 March 2007 at 10:08
Terry McMillan keeps saying that she wants to get along with her life. It doesn't seem like she does, she keeps doing things to complicate his life. IMHO.
Posted by: gio | 22 March 2007 at 10:09
40 MILLION DOLLARS? Jonathan has caused that much "emotional distress" and damage to Terry McMillan?
She really is unhinged.
Posted by: greg g | 22 March 2007 at 10:11
I hope the Contra Costa County Superior Court has sent someone out to purchase a paper shredder from Office Max.
Kevin C
ATL
Posted by: Kevin C | 22 March 2007 at 10:41
LMAO @ Kevin C
Posted by: Xavier Greene | 22 March 2007 at 11:39
Oh lawd, I can see her making faces already. Miss thing can twist her features better than Jennifer Holiday when she's being dramatic. Invasion of privacy? Didn't she write a book about the shit?
I smell bullshit. What does she wanna promote now? Another book? A movie? 40 million dollars? Where's he gonnna get that kinda cash? How much was that settlement?
Actually, this inquiring mind really doesn't give a shit. Like Andy said -- let it go.
Posted by: taylor Siluwé | 22 March 2007 at 12:20
Terry is intent on destroying that man. His sexuality has nothing to do with her but she, like many women, thinks that a man being gay is a rejection of her personally.
Terry, honey child, move along. Be a strong black woman and move on.
Posted by: ca | 22 March 2007 at 12:26
Ya'll needs to leave this woman alone, I don't blame her for being bitter that she was played for a fool by this chump. Sorry, I just can't condone a liar and cheat, no matter why he did it. Now, where does she think he's going to come up with $40 million duckets? I know she gave him big bucks, but, somehow I doubt if he can earn a living on his looks, too much makeup for me on a man, LOL! And, he probaly does not even have 40 cents left.
Posted by: John | 22 March 2007 at 12:34
"Leave this woman alone"??
Terry McMillan is the one who said on national television that she wante dto kill her husband. She's also been pulling him through years of bad publicity--good for her--and said in CLIK MAGAZINE that BLACK GAY MEN were JEALOUS OF HER.
I don't think we're doing anything to Terry McMillan. She's her own worst enemy.
Posted by: derrick | 22 March 2007 at 12:42
I think Ms. Terry should be paying him. I can't understand why she won't let it go and move on. She is still bitter and probably seeing that Jonathan is adjusting well in our community, moved on with his life, and she is jaded. She needs professional help, seriously.
Posted by: Mark Norris | 22 March 2007 at 12:42
She must have a new book to promote.
Posted by: C. Baptiste-Williams | 22 March 2007 at 13:08
Stunts & Shows. Jon-Jon isn't even worth $40 million. Go sit down Terry!
Posted by: D | 22 March 2007 at 13:23
Come on now, Terry has been itching for revenge ever since Jonathan came out.
Terry, it was good while it lasted. But you are losing whatever friends you thought you may have had within our community. Come on now.
Posted by: Come on Now | 22 March 2007 at 14:24
Terry has lost her mind.
Posted by: Charles | 22 March 2007 at 14:29
I'm just amazed you can sue an ex for 40 million dollars on charges of "humiliation" and "embarassment." This is good news. I think my fortune has been made ...
Posted by: Kai in NYC | 22 March 2007 at 14:35
Here is the problem that I have with Terry McMillan--and also thanks, Rod, for staying on this story--is that she has used her money and influence to make Jonathan's life miserable.
No, it's not good that he may have lied or cheated, but, unfortunately thats what homophobia and society often force upon men who are questioning their sexuality. It seems like he tried to resolve this issue and move along and Terry has been hounding this poor man forever.
Why sue him for $40 million? Or sue him for anything, for that matter. He doesn't have anything. But that is not enough for her.
And shame on any black gay man or lesbian who will support Terry McMillan after this.
Posted by: Jimmy David | 22 March 2007 at 14:35
As much as it is distasteful what Terry McMillan said and did, it is even more reprehensible that many within our community gave her a platform. I'm specifically referring to Clik, for giving Terry's homophobia a cover story. And yes, you too Rod, for doing the interview. I was shocked and saddened to see Terry McMillan's face on the cover on Clik and your name on that article, Rod.
Posted by: Intelligent Black Man | 22 March 2007 at 14:52
Hello.
Sorry, but you never saw my name on the Terry McMillan article. Just for the record, the "Clik" interview and feature story around Terry McMillan was conducted and written by L. Michael Gipson.
However, Ms. McMillan did contact me before and after that article was published. We had several, in-depth telephone conversations--they were strictly off the record, and, only mentioned once or twice on this site. Terry presented her concerns to me regarding my reporting on Rod 2.0. Terry is quite engaging and, one-on-one, comes across much more empathetic.
It seems that there is more than enough hurt and blame to go around. If anything struck me about the "Oprah" segment, it was that Terry still deeply loved Jonathan. I hope they can resolve these problems.
Posted by: Rod McCullom | 22 March 2007 at 15:24
A very moving (and understandably diplomatic) reply, Rod.
I agree that there's no one unsullied and unhurt. The central question here is whether one of the parties in this tussle is overreacting or staying in the spotlight for less than honorable motives.
And I too hope everyone can find peace--not just book deals, movie deals, advances, interviews or "vindication."
We appreciate your coverage, and any post of yours that provokes more than 18 comments (and isn't attached to pics of half-nekkid men) is a testimony to that. Keep takin the pulse...
Posted by: Andy in Seattle | 22 March 2007 at 16:52
Terry needs to go talk to Oprah ALONE. She needs an affirming hug and a good ol' fashioned nap. Can you imageine what being married to her must have been like? She is a little looney. She is just two claps from being all out crazy.
Posted by: MissRossToYou | 22 March 2007 at 20:45
Thanks, Andy.
It's no secret this weblog was quite critical of Terry McMillan. However, some of my previous comments were rather snarky. Terry McMillan called me up and said I was being too harsh. She was right. That hasn't changed my feelings on this story, but, hopefully changes the tone.
PS: Miss Ross, LOVE your screen name and LOVE your comments. Welcome back. ;)
Posted by: Rod McCullom | 22 March 2007 at 23:42
Y'all gay men who've led bisexual lives are just hell for women. Your sensitivity and sweet lovin' just drives them crazy, especially old ones, I mean, mature ones. Y'all gay dawgs. If you locked me in a bedroom with a woman, I wouldn't know what the hell to do--maybe fix her hair...on her head.
Posted by: Derrick from Philly | 23 March 2007 at 08:44
...you'd just treat them the way you'd want to be treated derrick, that's all...keep it simple and so many of life's questions become answered ones...
Posted by: yeahisaidit | 23 March 2007 at 13:10
Terry M is just plain ghetto fab...sigh
Posted by: Matt H. | 03 April 2007 at 20:36
i cant believe that she acts like a victim when she was 43 and he was a barely out of his teens when they got together, a cute mummies boy.she used this man-boy to feed her sick ego,i hpe she reads this cos on oprah,oprah & the oprah shrink were pussy footing around her it was suspicious(later fnd, terry had a new book deal wth oprah!)if she was a man they would of said,what do u expect dating an immature boy?&why didnt she divorce him when she knew he was gay 2 yrs b/f divorce?.he was serving a purpose in sme sick incestuous mother-child smothering.not to mention the ageing bitter & twisted terry using him like a sexy handbag.she was so demeaning and emasculating to him.her energy is so narcisistic its creepy.she was lucky to have him.of course he wanted her security($)why else would he stay with such a vacuous immature superficial,control freak.makes me embarased to be female when i see her basking in her ego nxt to her puppy-him.rich superficial pple like her sicken me and hve 2 buy nice pple.im sure she thks shes cher or diana ross!-$ cnt buy depth,class or grace!blessings,kate
Posted by: kate | 01 May 2007 at 00:03