The train wreck continues. Dick Durbin, the Senate majority whip and Illinois' senior senator, suggests embattled junior Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) should resign. Burris says thanks but no thanks.
Burris brushed by reporters after the meeting and would not comment except to say, "It was a good meeting." [...]
Durbin said he would not support Burris if he ran to retain the seat next year, which Burris has not ruled out. Durbin repeatedly said he was "disappointed" that Burris had not disclosed all of his contacts with Blagojevich, which Durbin and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had demanded as a condition of the Senate seating Burris last month.
Burris changed his testimony and now admits he was approached by associates of then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D), and, even tried to raise money for the now-impeached governor.
In addition to Durbin, the new governor, Pat Quinn, has also called for Burris' resignation. So much for Roland Burris' appointment "not" being tainted by the governor impeached for trying to sell that Senate seat.
Burris Refuses to Resign [WaPo]








there's nothing to see here, keep moving
Posted by: Antwan | 24 February 2009 at 17:21
Okay, it doesn't seem like such a good idea after all. Burris has turned out to be a disapointment and embarassing the Democrats. How were we supposed to know? And yes, I guess you did say all along it would be a problem Rod but many of us (at least I) just took the man at his word and didnt see how Blagojevich's problems rubbed off on him. I was wrong.
Posted by: Katt | 24 February 2009 at 20:11
I don't think any Democrats are gleeful at this situation, Katt. Unfortunately it was entirely predictable what would happeen. A number of people said it, I said it on this blog, Rod surely said it and we were shouted down.
The governor was accused of trying to sell the senate seat. There was absolutely no reason to believe he didn't try to sell the seat too Burris, too. Now it turns out he did and Burris lied. What else is he lying about?
We do this to ourselves. I just want the nightmare to be over.
Posted by: Alan T | 24 February 2009 at 20:40
Burris...Burris...Burris just give it up already...
Posted by: thegaytekeeper | 24 February 2009 at 21:27
I right in the thick of all this hot mess in Chicago.
Blago's style throughout this whole thing has been in your face. He tried to sell the Senate seat. This fool took it, knowing that he wasn't going to get elected in 2010 anty-way.
Blago played Reid to be sure, but this clown needs to go.
Posted by: Kevin | 24 February 2009 at 23:56
REWIND}
I am right in the thick of all this hot mess in Chicago
Posted by: Kevin | 24 February 2009 at 23:57
All politicians solicit. Tt's a "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" society. STOP acting like this is new to y'all. Hillary said she'll back Obama in the General election if he'll help pay down her campaign debt. What's the difference? Judd said he'll only take the Commerce Sec. job only if replaced by a Republican. What's the difference?
There is a big difference. Retiring a competitor's campaign debt is not illegal. Demanding campaign contributions in exchange for an appointment is illegal. But if you think is no big deal, tell the Illinois legislature that impeached Blagojevich and the Senate Ethics Committee, among others, now investigating Burris. -RM
Posted by: Ro | 25 February 2009 at 06:52
Oprah ought to have him removed...from the Senate, not the Earth.
Posted by: Derrick from Philly | 25 February 2009 at 10:58