Heath Shuler, the anti-gay conservative Blue Dog "Democrat" from western North Carolina who is opposed to gay rights, marriage equality, ENDA and hate crimes legislation, now adds another "anti" to his portfolio: Anti-health care reform. Oh and it may have something to do with his largest campaign contributors.
During a telephone town hall meeting, the congressmen who gets free and subsidized health care from the government explained ... he is against free and subsidized health care for his constituents because it "would increase the deficit [and] doesn't reduce the overall cost of health care," reports the Asheville Citizen Times
Shuler answered 24 questions during the session, which lasted about an hour. "I do not support HR3200 at the present time," Shuler said during brief opening remarks, referring to the House bill that has passed three committees and will be eligible for consideration by the full House when Congress returns after Labor Day. But the Waynesville Democrat, a member of the conservative Blue Dog Coalition of House Democrats, said the process should not be rushed even if that means delaying reform until after the end of this year, the deadline set by President Barack Obama. "We've got to make sure we do this right the first time. We're only going to have one shot," he said.
Shuler spent much of the call emphasizing that the current legislation does not do enough to promote wellness, prevention and disease management. Nor is enough being done to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid, he said.
Shuler's opposition came on the same day residents in his largely rural district held another meeting where they spoke out against the lack of access to health care and prohibitive costs. One college student said she couldn't afford the $100 per month in premiums and "didn't know anyone in Asheville who had health insurance."
Shuler, who has a Human Rights Campaign campaign score of 10, also "took in more money from the health care industry than any other House Democrat from North Carolina during his re-election campaign", according to Democracy North Carolina. Shuler raised $130,852 from health professionals, pharmaceuticals, hospitals and other medical providers in 2008, according to filings.
You want to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare? Those are the people to start with. You keep telling yourself that as you cash those checks, Heath.
Shuler Explains Opposition to House Health Care [CT]
Shuler Gets $130K From Health Care [CT]








But these people elected him. Would they have elected a liberal or progressive candidate in that district? Probably not. This, again, is the problem I have mentioned before. The Dems expanded their numbers in Congress by running candidates who weren't true Democrats but were competitive in more conservative districts. You lie down with dogs and you get up with fleas. People keep saying that these folks should be voted out. The problem with that is a Republican will get elected instead. Either you will get a Dem who will stab you in the back, or you get a Repub who will slit your throat. Neither one is a good choice.
Posted by: Ravenback | 15 August 2009 at 16:24
((Shuler's opposition came on the same day residents in his largely rural district held another meeting where they spoke out against the lack of access to health care and prohibitive costs. One college student said she couldn't afford the $100 per month in premiums and "didn't know anyone in Asheville who had health insurance."))
Ravenback you are right. Shuler is another Blue Dog "Democrat" and a creation of Pelosi and Rahm Emmanuel to increase Dems in the House. Many of them do not have core Democratic values.
The paragraph above illustrates the problem. This is a largely rural district, probably fairly poor and the residents surely have poor access to hospitals and insurance is expensive. Health care reform would help these people but the debate has been framed against it. Who better wants access to hospitals and health insurance than rural folk and people in the inner city?
Posted by: Chris Cruz | 15 August 2009 at 16:31
((the congressmen who gets free and subsidized health care from the government explained ... he is against free and subsidized health care for his constituents))
Oh and Rod, you know you have a way with words lol
Posted by: Chris Cruz | 15 August 2009 at 16:34
@ Chris Cruz
You are right about the rural districts. They should be more interested in health care access and other issues of the poor. But these same rural districts tend to be more conservative. They often reject gay rights, affirmative action, and often confuse policies that assist the poor with policies designed to help blacks. It's that age-old problem of voting against your own interests.
Posted by: Ravenback | 15 August 2009 at 16:47
Your last paragraph sums up both the Blue Dog's and 99% of the GOP, stop cashing the big checks and you might see things different. And, why don't the so called Blue Dog's just run as Republicans since that's what they are, its not as if they won't win in a district like his anyway.
Posted by: Luther | 15 August 2009 at 17:56
@Chris Cruz: Exactly.
@ Ravenback: You made this point yesterday in the Rasmussen Poll and you're absolutely right. Pelosi, Emmanuel and the Democrats fielded conservative candidates in red and purple districts. The people get what they pay for. For the record, tho, access to health care is even more acute in rural areas. You would think these people would want HCR. Unfortunately, as you and Chris indicated, they often vote against their own interests. -RM
Posted by: Rod Mc | 15 August 2009 at 21:52
Blue Dogs could care less about health care reform. And sadly i don't think it will happen because of that, at least meaningful reform. It's bad enough that single payer was taken off the table but if there is no public option it's just health insurance "reform."
Posted by: D. Askew | 16 August 2009 at 03:14
I'm just SMH,
This is SO SAD....I have never seen so many SO CALLED BLUE DOGS...These folks are nothing but DIXIECRATS call it like you see it.
This party for the most I feel does NOT support our President. There is so much of pullback from these folks and I not dare mention the ANGRY WHITE FOLKS at these town halls.
Did you guys see the one in Montana when the Pres took a question from a Man who started off by saying "I'm a card carrying NRA Member"...OKAY AND WHO ASKED YOU??????? I thought this was about Healthcare???
Why are these folks opposed to helping UNINSURED AMERICANS get proper coverage saying it will cost too much. But they don't have a problem with spending 10 BILLION a month for a WAR IN IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN?????
OH GOD help me...
I think I'm about to faint!
As Fred Sanford says
"OH ELIZABETH THIS IS THE BIG ONE!"
Posted by: MRCHOCOLATE615 | 16 August 2009 at 23:08
We need to replace Heath Shuler. Go to replaceheathshuler.org
Posted by: Matt Utterback | 20 August 2009 at 19:13