The House of Representatives is expected to begin debate and vote today on a new bill to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." The bill was introduced yesterday and is identical to the stand-alone repeal measure introduced in the Senate last week, reports the Washington Blade.
On Tuesday, Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.) introduced companion legislation in the U.S. House. Drew Hammill, spokesperson for U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said a vote on the bill will take place on Wednesday. The plan was to have a vote in the House and to send the legislation to the Senate as a “privileged” bill, which would allow the Senate to take up the measure without having a cloture vote on the motion to proceed.
The maneuver would skip the 60 votes needed for the motion to proceed with the legislation and shave off the 30 hours of time that is normally needed after cloture is filed to vote on whether to end debate. Still, even with this plan, the Senate would need 60 votes to proceed to final passage of the legislation.
Murphy, an Iraq war veteran, is the sponsor of the DADT repeal amendment that passed the House by an historic 234-194 vote in May 2010.
Passage in the House is expected. The prospects in the Senate, of course, are murkier. Sam Stein at the Huffington Post offers some insight:
In a wide range of interviews with individuals working on Senate strategy, the path forward has begun to emerge. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will push to bring the bill to the floor sometime early next week, a Senate leadership aide said, ideally with legislation on tax cuts and the budget complete. Reid may have to fill the tree with amendments -- thereby setting in stone how the debate process plays out. But if he does this without accommodating Republican requests, it could give senators the cover they need to oppose the measure on procedural grounds.
More likely, Reid will grant the GOP a chance to air its proposed amendments and hope that they lack the support to stick. If one does pass, the bill would have to be sent back to the House, prolonging the repeal process or even threatening it, depending on the changes.
"Is it an ambitious strategy, yes," said Aubrey Sarvis, an Army veteran who serves as executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. "But it is a viable option, a realistic one."
Reid warned yesterday that he’ll call the Senate into session after Christmas to address the unfinished business of the lame duck session, such as the START treaty, DREAM Act, and DADT repeal. "Congress ends Jan. 4," said Reid. "And we’re going to continue working on this stuff until we get it done."